If I understood her correctly, while each genre may and generally does involve a romantic element the focus of each is different. In the romance novel the romance itself is the focus, whereas in the chick lit novel the romantic relationship is at most a factor in the protagonist’s growth or journey. Donna says that in chick lit, “Whether the protagonist ends up with a man is not as relevant as the learning process she experiences through various situations that culminate in her resolving her issues…” See the full article for more: BigAl’s Books and Pals: Chick Lit and Romance Fiction / A Defining Moment.
A lively discussion follows this article. I was surprised to find a comment attacking the genres for being ‘silly’ and ‘boring’. For one thing, the comment was not on topic. No one asked for a personal opinion of the genres. Secondly, it was rude and arrogant. The attacker tried to impose his distaste for the genre on others. Third, it wasn’t smart, since he is now an author with at least one less potential fan. But I digress.
The comment that the genres are silly and boring did start me thinking: Romance and chick lit have been mocked and belittled for ages, yet they are as popular as ever. No amount of eye-rolling or finger-gagging is going to change the fact that women love these books. But despite their popularity, have the genres truly been accepted as legitimate forms of literature? Yes, we read them, but how many of us are proud of it? Are we more likely to boast about reading a well-known piece of historical fiction or the latest chick-lit favourite?
Click below to be taken to the original article:
Cookie’s Book Club: Women’s fiction versus other genres of literature